Renault Koleos 2011 vs Ford Kuga 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 175 HP | 140 - 182 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 360 NM | 230 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 12.3 seconds | 9.7 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 9.6 | 5.9 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Koleos petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Kuga. On average, Renault Koleos equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Koleos and Ford Kuga are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
| Renault Koleos has 6 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`206 | ~ 2`213 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |