Renault Koleos 2013 vs Renault Kadjar 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Koleos is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Renault Kadjar also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 171 - 173 HP | 110 - 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 360 NM | 205 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | 9.9 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.9 | 3.8 - 5.6 | |
|
Renault Koleos petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. On average, Renault Koleos equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.52 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Renault Koleos is larger. Renault Koleos is 7 cm longer than the Renault Kadjar, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Koleos is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1380 litres | 1478 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Renault Koleos has 22 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kadjar. This could mean that the Renault Koleos uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 98 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Koleos is 0.9 metres more than that of the Renault Kadjar, which means Renault Koleos can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`223 | ~ 1`935 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Renault Koleos scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Koleos has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |