Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Opel Combo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Combo, but torque is 8 NM more than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.5 | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Kangoo 2003 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Kangoo 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2500 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`850 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |