Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Fiat Doblo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 16 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 12 HP more power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Despite the higher power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 5.5 | |
|
The Fiat Doblo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 16 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Kangoo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Doblo, so Renault Kangoo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |