Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Renault Kangoo
2003 - 2005
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 82 HP71 HP
Torque: 185 NM125 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.2 seconds15.8 seconds
Renault Kangoo engine produces 11 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Despite the higher power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.46.2
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Kangoo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle870 km in combined cycle
820 km on highway1080 km on highway
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.19 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.83 m1.40 m
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher.
Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 43 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`100
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 1600800
Pros and Cons: Renault Kangoo has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
Citroen Xsara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv