Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 71 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
Renault Kangoo engine produces 11 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Despite the higher power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 6.2 | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.00 m | 4.19 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.83 m | 1.40 m | |
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 43 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`100 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |