Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 40 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 17 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |