Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 8 NM more than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 26 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 220 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 760 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |