Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Fiat Doblo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.3 seconds | 16 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Fiat Doblo. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
| Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 16 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Kangoo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Fiat Doblo, so Renault Kangoo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |