Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Opel Combo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 19 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Meriva, Opel Corsa | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |