Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 105 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo 2003 and Renault Kangoo 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kangoo 2003 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo 2005, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo 2003 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo 2005, which means Renault Kangoo 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`570 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |