Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.1 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 60 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo 2003 engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Kangoo 2005, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Renault Kangoo 2005. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.0 | |
| Renault Kangoo 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo 2005, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kangoo 2003 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo 2005, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo 2003 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo 2003 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo 2005, which means Renault Kangoo 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |