Renault Kangoo 2006 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.1 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caddy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 470'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kangoo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Seat Altea, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2006 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Kangoo 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 35 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2239 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`200 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |