Renault Kangoo 2006 vs Opel Combo 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 97 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Combo, but torque is 8 NM more than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.5 | |
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 27 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 455 litres | |
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |