Renault Kangoo 2006 vs Opel Combo 2004

 
Renault Kangoo
2006 - 2008
Opel Combo
2004 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP97 HP
Torque: 148 NM140 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds14 seconds
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive.
Renault Kangoo engine produces 2 HP less power than Opel Combo, but torque is 8 NM more than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.77.5
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Kangoo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
Opel Combo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.32 m
Width: 1.67 m1.69 m
Height: 1.89 m1.80 m
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher.
Renault Kangoo is 27 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 650 litres455 litres
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Combo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 16002400
Pros and Cons: Renault Kangoo has
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Opel Combo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv