Renault Kangoo 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2003

 
Renault Kangoo
2006 - 2008
Ford C-Max
2003 - 2007
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 95 HP100 HP
Torque: 148 NM145 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.1 seconds12.9 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Kangoo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 3 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.76.9
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Renault Kangoo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.33 m
Width: 1.67 m1.82 m
Height: 1.89 m1.60 m
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher.
Renault Kangoo is 28 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 29 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 650 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1620 litres
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max.
Gross weight (kg): 1`200no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

average
Ford C-Max has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons: Renault Kangoo has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Ford C-Max has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv