Renault Kangoo 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2003
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 95 HP | 100 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 3 NM more than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.9 | |
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 570 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.89 m | 1.60 m | |
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 28 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 29 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |