Renault Kangoo 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford C-Max, but torque is 3 NM more than Ford C-Max. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.9 | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`150 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |