Renault Kangoo 2005 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 8.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Caddy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 2 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volkswagen Touran, Seat Altea, Seat Toledo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller. Renault Kangoo is 36 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 90 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`150 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |