Renault Kangoo 2005 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 41 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 29 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford C-Max has
| |