Renault Kangoo 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 61 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 59 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 170 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.4 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.04 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 22 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 220 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Renault Scenic has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Renault Scenic quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |