Renault Kangoo 2008 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Kangoo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Ford Tourneo) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 148 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 20 HP more power than Ford Tourneo, but torque is 72 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Thanks to more power Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.4 | |
|
The Ford Tourneo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Ford Tourneo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.98 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 36 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1977 litres | 3500 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Renault Kangoo has 962 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1523 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`924 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`430 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 494 kg | 785 kg | |
| Renault Kangoo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 59 procentiem less than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |