Renault Kangoo 2008 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 183 mm (7.2 inches) | 130 mm (5.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kangoo can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kangoo version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 5 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1977 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 32 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 137 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`982 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |