Renault Kangoo 2008 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 10 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.63 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 17 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kangoo is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1977 litres | 1684 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 6 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 293 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`982 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |