Renault Kangoo 2008 vs Citroen Nemo 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Renault Kangoo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Citroen Nemo) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 HP | 73 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 16.2 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 32 HP more power than Citroen Nemo, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Citroen Nemo. Thanks to more power Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is larger. Renault Kangoo is 25 cm longer than the Citroen Nemo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1977 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Renault Kangoo has 82 litres more trunk space than the Citroen Nemo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 1 metres more than that of the Citroen Nemo, which means Renault Kangoo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`982 | 1`690 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Citroen Nemo has
| |