Renault Kangoo 2008 vs Ford Tourneo 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Tourneo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 5 HP less power than Ford Tourneo, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Ford Tourneo. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Tourneo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2008 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.98 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 36 cm shorter than the Ford Tourneo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 438 litres | 1400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1977 litres | 3500 litres | |
|
Ford Tourneo has more luggage space. Renault Kangoo has 962 litres less trunk space than the Ford Tourneo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Tourneo (by 1523 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Tourneo, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`954 kg | 2`330 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`464 kg | 1`545 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 785 kg | |
| Renault Kangoo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 60 procentiem less than Ford Tourneo. Therefore, Ford Tourneo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford Tourneo has
| |