Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 8 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 29 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caddy, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 190 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 470 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The Volkswagen Caddy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 600 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`924 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |