Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Dacia Dokker 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 17 HP more power than Dacia Dokker, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Dacia Dokker. Thanks to more power Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Renault Kangoo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Dokker, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 28 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Dacia Duster, Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Dacia Lodgy | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Dokker might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 15 cm shorter than the Dacia Dokker, 8 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 800 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 3000 litres | |
|
Dacia Dokker has more luggage space. Renault Kangoo has 140 litres less trunk space than the Dacia Dokker. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dacia Dokker (by 400 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dacia Dokker, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`924 kg | 1`768 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`090 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 604 kg | 678 kg | |
| Renault Kangoo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Dacia Dokker. Therefore, Dacia Dokker is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Dokker has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Dacia Dokker quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Dacia Dokker has
| |