Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 24 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 3.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.58 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 23 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`954 kg | 1`830 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`320 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 634 kg | 410 kg | |
| Renault Kangoo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 35 procentiem more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Therefore, Renault Kangoo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |