Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 24 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 88 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1046 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | 2`097 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 390 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |