Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Renault Scenic 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 24 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1530 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 15 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 1870 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 190 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The Renault Scenic may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 730 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | 1`967 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kangoo is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Renault Scenic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Renault Scenic, so Renault Scenic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |