Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Opel Combo 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo engine produces 4 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Opel Combo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1050 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller. Renault Kangoo is 18 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kangoo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 790 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 3200 litres | |
|
Opel Combo has more luggage space. Renault Kangoo has 130 litres less trunk space than the Opel Combo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Combo (by 600 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kangoo is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |