Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Opel Combo 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 44 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Opel Combo. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kangoo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Opel Combo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Renault Kangoo 2013 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 597 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 2126 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 63 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 474 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 15 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |