Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 29 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Renault Kangoo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Renault Kangoo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1420 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.63 m | |
| Renault Kangoo is 17 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kangoo is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 228 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 916 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Renault Kangoo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Renault Kangoo scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Kangoo scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |