Renault Kangoo 2013 vs Ford C-Max 2010
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 95 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Renault Kangoo engine produces 9 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 4.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 53 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1300 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
1000 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Kangoo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.21 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.63 m | |
Renault Kangoo is 17 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kangoo is 18 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 660 litres | 432 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | 1684 litres | |
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 228 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 916 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.2 metres less than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`954 | 1`915 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | average | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 9000 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |