Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Opel Combo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 93 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.6 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Opel Combo is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 22 HP less power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Opel Combo. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 52 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 32 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 195 litres more trunk space than the Opel Combo. The Opel Combo may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Combo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Opel Combo has
| |