Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998

 
Renault Kangoo
2003 - 2005
Mitsubishi Space Star
1998 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 68 HP86 HP
Torque: 93 NM117 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 18.6 seconds13.4 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving.
Renault Kangoo engine produces 18 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 5.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.8
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.00 m4.03 m
Width: 1.66 m1.70 m
Height: 1.84 m1.52 m
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher.
Renault Kangoo is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 32 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 650 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2600 litres1370 litres
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kangoo has 280 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1230 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters9.6 meters
The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Renault Kangoo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`655
Safety: no data
Quality:
low
no data
Average price (€): 1800800
Pros and Cons: Renault Kangoo has
  • roomier boot
Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv