Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
| Renault Kangoo 2003 and Renault Kangoo 2005 have the same engine power, but Renault Kangoo 2003 torque is 9 NM more than Renault Kangoo 2005. Renault Kangoo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
|
The Renault Kangoo 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo 2003 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo 2003 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| Renault Kangoo 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kangoo 2003 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo 2005, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo 2003 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo 2003 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Kangoo 2005, which means Renault Kangoo 2003 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`640 | 1`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |