Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Fiat Doblo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 HP | 63 HP | |
| Torque: | 125 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.5 seconds | 20.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 8 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, but torque is 7 NM more than Fiat Doblo. Despite less power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.7 | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Fiat Doblo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but slightly higher. Renault Kangoo is 16 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`625 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Fiat Doblo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Kangoo, so Fiat Doblo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |