Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kangoo engine produces 22 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 5.5 | |
| Renault Kangoo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kangoo could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 3 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mitsubishi Space Star may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Renault Kangoo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`660 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`125 kg | 1`350 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 535 kg | 380 kg | |
| Renault Kangoo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Space Star. Therefore, Renault Kangoo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |