Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Kangoo is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kangoo engine produces 9 HP more power than Citroen Xsara, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen Xsara. Thanks to more power Renault Kangoo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.2 | |
|
The Renault Kangoo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kangoo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that by driving the Renault Kangoo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.83 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 43 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`660 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kangoo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |