Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 95 HP | 61 - 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 81 - 185 NM | 105 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 21.2 seconds | 10.7 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 5.3 - 8.7 | |
|
Renault Kangoo 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kangoo 2005. On average, Renault Kangoo 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo 2005. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kangoo 2003 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo 2005, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo 2003 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`179 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |