Renault Kangoo 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Renault Kangoo is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Citroen Xsara can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.9 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 95 HP | 71 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 81 - 185 NM | 120 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 - 21.2 seconds | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 8.6 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Renault Kangoo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara. On average, Renault Kangoo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Renault Kangoo is smaller, but higher. Renault Kangoo is 19 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Renault Kangoo is 44 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 650 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2600 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kangoo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`684 | ~ 1`086 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kangoo has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |