Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Renault Kadjar) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Citroen C5 Aircross) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 37 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Citroen C5 Aircross engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Peugeot 3008, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C5 Aircross might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C5 Aircross, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 108 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`889 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |