Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Opel Mokka 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 19 HP more power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Opel Mokka. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 158 mm (6.2 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Mokka engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Meriva, Opel Insignia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger, but lower. Renault Kadjar is 21 cm longer than the Opel Mokka, 6 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 356 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
Renault Kadjar has more luggage capacity. Renault Kadjar has 116 litres more trunk space than the Opel Mokka. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kadjar (by 106 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 1`843 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Mokka has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Mokka, so Opel Mokka quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |