Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar engine produces 9 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Despite the higher power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 191 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Kadjar and Volkswagen Tiguan are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 143 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`918 kg | 2`140 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`471 kg | 1`423 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 717 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 60 procentiem less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Volkswagen Tiguan is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Tiguan has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |
