Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Opel Grandland 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Grandland is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 21 HP less power than Opel Grandland, but torque is 20 NM more than Opel Grandland. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 188 mm (7.4 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 1 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 514 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1652 litres | |
|
Opel Grandland has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Renault Kadjar uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 174 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Opel Grandland, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`918 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`471 kg | 1`425 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 575 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Opel Grandland. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Opel Grandland has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Kadjar has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Opel Grandland, so Opel Grandland quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |