Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 159 HP | 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Renault Kadjar and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Kadjar engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Used also on Nissan Qashqai | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 20 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 135 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 337 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 399 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 18 000 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
| |