Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Ford Kuga 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 159 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 370 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 9 HP more power than Ford Kuga, but torque is 100 NM less than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 4 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 456 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | 1603 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Renault Kadjar has 16 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The Ford Kuga may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Kuga (by 125 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the Renault Kadjar is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Renault Kadjar can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 2`230 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | low | |
Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Kuga has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 18 000 | 13 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |