Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 159 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
Renault Kadjar engine produces 9 HP more power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Citroen C5 Aircross. Despite the higher power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 8 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4, Peugeot 5008 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C5 Aircross, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1478 litres | no data | |
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 108 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`918 | 1`980 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 18 000 | 24 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |