Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Opel Grandland 2021
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Renault Kadjar) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Opel Grandland) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 6.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Grandland is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 84 HP less power than Opel Grandland, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Opel Grandland. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 5.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.6 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Renault Kadjar is 1 cm longer than the Opel Grandland, 7 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1528 litres | |
| Renault Kadjar has 82 litres more trunk space than the Opel Grandland. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Grandland (by 50 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`994 kg | 2`370 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`547 kg | 1`801 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 569 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Opel Grandland. Therefore, Opel Grandland is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 400 | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Opel Grandland has
| |