Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Nissan Qashqai 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Renault Kadjar is more dynamic to drive. Renault Kadjar engine produces 1 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, but torque is 25 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.4 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kadjar consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kadjar could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is larger. Renault Kadjar is 10 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Renault Kadjar is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1598 litres | |
| Renault Kadjar has 42 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`994 kg | 1`975 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`547 kg | 1`475 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 500 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Nissan Qashqai. Therefore, Nissan Qashqai is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Kadjar has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Renault Kadjar, so Renault Kadjar quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |