Renault Kadjar 2018 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Renault Kadjar engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Renault Kadjar reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 4.1 | |
|
The Citroen C5 Aircross is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Renault Kadjar consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Kadjar could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1070 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen C5 Aircross gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Kadjar can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Kadjar version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Combo, Citroen Berlingo, Opel Grandland | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Kadjar might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen C5 Aircross engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Kadjar 2018 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Renault Kadjar is smaller. Renault Kadjar is 1 cm shorter than the Citroen C5 Aircross, width is practically the same , while the height of Renault Kadjar is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 472 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1478 litres | 1630 litres | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Renault Kadjar has 108 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Citroen C5 Aircross (by 152 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`994 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`547 kg | 1`430 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 447 kg | 590 kg | |
| Renault Kadjar load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Therefore, Citroen C5 Aircross is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 16 800 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Kadjar has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |